Curse

A Leprechaun · Dec 20, 2007, 05:39 PM // 17:39

Considering all the s*** HB gets whenever it gets posted in a build I would say that it is better than it gets credit for, you only have to read Yichi's post in this very thread to see what I'm talking about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yichi

It has hundred blades....

umm....

trying.....

nope, nothing

I know that TC and DS are better than HB, but HB is a viable option, in my opinion, and is a nice mix of the AoE effects of TC and adrenaline gain of DS, with some nice double attack/buff damage added in.

~A Leprechaun~

Arkantos · Dec 20, 2007, 05:41 PM // 17:41

As I said before in this thread, mixing aoe and single target dps is doing nothing but gimping you. Either go all out aoe or all out single target damage. That is why people run dslash/triple chop over hb.

A Leprechaun · Dec 20, 2007, 06:27 PM // 18:27

Ok, one last time, I am not saying HB is as good as DS or TC.
Its a fun and usable alternative that does not deserve the negativity that surrounds it on these forums.
I'll leave it at that.

~A Leprechaun~

Coloneh · Dec 20, 2007, 10:26 PM // 22:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaigoda

But HB is the core of the build. The AoE double-attack is what makes it so powerful, Triple Chop can't do that (less damage, slower recharge, other axe skills suck, you can't use both Cyclone and Triple without lots of e-management)

/fail

are you on drugs?

most axe skills are better than sword skills. have you even seen dismember, executioner's, evis, cyclone, triple or a bunch of other skills?

and did you say HB was powerful? your doing 2 auto attacks with a sword to everyone around your target. auto attacks on a sword are almost as bad as auto attacks on a dagger.

cyclone and triple chop are their own E-management, bring a zealous wep.